Wilkerson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 34 U.S.C. § 20911 · 34 U.S.C. § 20912 · 34 U.S.C. § 20913 · 34 U.S.C. § 20915 · 34 U.S.C. § 20927 · 42 U.S.C. § 16911
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Carr v. United States · Bennie v. Munn · Doe v. Phillips · Leblanc v. Foley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'it is not supported by substantial evidence, is against the weight of the evidence, or erroneously declares or applies the law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“register, and keep the registration current, in each jurisdiction where the offender resides.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]ny conduct that by its nature is a sex offense against a minor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.