Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 F.2d 1346 - Nathan S. Smith v. Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine Grimm

Nathan S. Smith v. Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine Grimm’s Empirical Analysis

534 F.2d 1346 · 1976

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 12 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Hunter v. United Van Lines (1984), Stone v. Stone (1980)

55 federal appellate · 12 district ·

38019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Hagans v. Lavine · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . .of all civil actions wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and arises under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a direct and essential element of the plaintiff's cause of action.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.