Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 F.2d 205 - United States v. Bryan

United States v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

534 F.2d 205 · 1976

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
February 2001
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2001 · most notably United States v. Bohr (1978), United States v. Williams (1991)

20 federal appellate ·

1301976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)

Relies on Corallo v. United States · United States v. Harris · Shorter v. United States · United States v. LeVison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant] is in no position to complain. It was his counsel who, perhaps for some strategic purpose, first introduced the fact of the prior conviction into evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.