Wilson v. Zarhadnick’s Empirical Analysis
534 F.2d 55 · 1976
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2020
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Jones v. Diamond · Nationwide Amusements, Inc. v. Nattin · T. M. T. Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Union De Tronquistas De Puerto Rico, Local 901 · Puerto Rican Farm Workers ex rel. Vidal v. Eatmon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a state prison inmate is not an indigent, if he has adequate financial resources with which to employ counsel of his own choice, is the state under a constitutional obligation to furnish the inmate with legal research material?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Straub v. Monge“Article III courts have jurisdiction over actual controversies; they are not permitted the luxury of issuing advisory opinions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.