Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 F.2d 613 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

534 F.2d 613 · 1976

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
October 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering & Machine, Inc. (1978), Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States ex rel. U. S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Wage & Hour Division (1982)

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

17019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize · Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks Department · Employees of Department of Public Health Welfare Missouri v. Department of Public Health & Welfare Missouri · Fisher v. United States · Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Settlement agreements have always been a favored means of resolving disputes. When fairly arrived at and properly entered into, they are generally viewed as binding, final, and as conclusive of rights as a judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot be construed to approve nonjudicial settlements of wage and hour claims in situations removed from the unique facts of this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.