Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 F.2d 822 - Mason v. Hunter

Mason v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

534 F.2d 822 · 1976

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2002

13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bugh v. Webb · Coward v. Casey Jones, Contractor, Inc. · Haynes Drilling Corporation v. Smith · Ellis v. Hubbard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While it would have been better housekeeping for defendant[s] to have requested an amendment, or for the trial court on its own motion to have ordered such, the rights of plaintiff[s] to a fair trial free from surprise were not violated. Plaintiff[s] knew of the issue and in a limited sense by implication consented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... Rule 15(b) does not require that a conforming amendment be made and there is no penalty for failing to do so. The rule clearly states that the absence of a formal amendment or a request for leave to amend `does not affect the result of the trial' of those issues actually litigated. Id., § 1493 at 460-61.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “if necessary, an amendment can even be made on appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.