Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 F.3d 531 - Phillips v. Roane County

Phillips v. Roane County’s Empirical Analysis

534 F.3d 531 · 2008

Citation profile

135
cited by 135 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Everson v. Leis (2009), Miller v. Sanilac County (2010)

20 federal appellate ·

1090200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Estelle v. Gamble · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment generally provides the basis to assert a § 1983 claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, but where that claim is asserted on behalf of a pre-trial detainee, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the proper starting point.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There are two parts to the claim, one objective, one subjective. For the objective component, the detainee must demonstrate the existence of a sufficiently serious medical need.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Blackmore v. Kalamazoo County , 390 F.3d 890 , 899-900 (6th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted). In contrast, the subjective component requires a plaintiff to”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.