534 F. Supp. 1224 - Tomarkin v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 7 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “‘[t]he party opposing the motion must set forth “concrete particulars” and cannot make a secret of his evidence, holding it close to his chest until the trial____’ He may not merely assert conclusions without supplying arguments or facts in opposition to the motion____ He must ‘bring to the district court’s attention some affirmative indication that his version of relevant events is not fanciful.’”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 676 F. Supp. 581 - Wilson v. Maben

2. “)), and New York State Public Health Law § 2805-b for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and because such claims are time-barred. 7 In his complaint, Owens alleges that he received deficient medical treatment at Bellevue Hospital, a facility under the jurisdiction of the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Alonzo Spencer Owens v. Bellevue Hospital Center, Nyc Health and Hospitals Corp., and the City of New York

3. “a complaint that a physician has been negligent in diagnosing or treating a medical condition does not state a valid claim of medical mistreatment under the Eighth Amendment. Medical malpractice does not become a constitutional violation merely because the victim is a prisoner.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 72 F. Supp. 2d 24 - Nunez v. Horn