Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.âs Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 6A (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Erickson v. Pardus · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Fogerty Fantasy Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each â the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
âdifficult to determine whether the higher prices set and established in the U.S. proximately caused the foreign entities associated with plaintiffs to pay higher prices abroad.â
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majorityâa number of significant intervening steps between the negotiation of the purchase price and plaintiffs' injuries,â
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated â in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.