Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 NW2D 350 - State v. Chase in Winter

State v. Chase in Winter’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2018

19 state decisions

90199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · United States v. Hendrix · State v. Basker · State v. Andrews · State v. Lykken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sentencing court should acquire a thorough acquaintance with the character and history of the man before it. This study should examine a defendant’s general moral character, mentality, habits, social environment, tendencies, age, aversion or inclination to commit crime, life, family, occupation, and previous criminal record.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “acquire a thorough acquaintance with the character and history of the [person] before it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “First, is the punishment so excessive or so cruel, “as to meet the disapproval and condemnation of the conscience and reason of men generally.” And second, whether the punishment is so excessive or so cruel as to shock the collective conscience of this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.