Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 N.W.2d 388 - Morris v. Leaf

Morris v. Leaf’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
6
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2023

10 state decisions

501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Red Giant Oil Co. v. Lawlor · Saarinen v. Kerr · Krull v. THERMOGAS CO. OF NORTHWOOD IA. · Sankey v. Richenberger · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has intentionally done an act of an unreasonable character in disregard of a risk known to or so obvious that he must be taken to have been aware of it, and so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “limiting personal liability for the consequences of high-speed chases to reckless rather than mere negligent conduct will provide for vigorous law enforcement without placing innocent bystanders at undue risk”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The plaintiffs also rely on Iowa Code section 670.2 to establish liability. That statute is general in its scope, making municipalities liable for the torts of their employees. However, that statute does not create liability for the acts of police officers that involve mere negligence and therefore do not provide a basis for liability of the employee personally. That is the case here; we find no duty owing from the employee to the public and therefore con-elude that section 670.2 is inapplicable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.