Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 NW2D 554 - State v. Terpstra

State v. Terpstra’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Olson · State v. Robinson · State v. O'BRIEN · State v. Belfry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This case, however, deals with restitution and the burden of proof for restitution is a preponderance of the evidence, not the beyond a reasonable doubt standard necessary for a conviction. The district court, in imposing Terpstra’s sentence, did not follow the determination of the jury. The purposes of restitution, however, are not limited to punishing the offender. Restitu-" tion is also an attempt to compensate victims for their losses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.