Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 NW2D 712 - Wallin v. Letourneau

Wallin v. Letourneau’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2018

18 state decisions

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & Clinics · A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc. · O'Brien v. Mercy Hospital & Convalescent Nursing Care Section · Wallin v. Letourneau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actual notice of sufficient facts reasonably to put the licensee ... on notice of a possible claim complies with the notice requirement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the time and date when and person to whom the alcoholic beverages were sold or bartered; (2) the name and address of the person or persons who were injured or whose property was damaged; and (3) the approximate time and date, and the place where the injury to person or property occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact; and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.