State v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tooley v. Alm · State v. Tweed · State v. Kraft · State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027 · State v. Hanson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The commonly understood meaning of “involve” is “to include as a necessary circumstance, condition, or consequence; .... ” Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 1005 (2d ed.1987). “Involving” is not limited to engaging in the activity. It merely requires the activity to be a necessary condition or circumstance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.