Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 So. 2d 1143 - Stowers v. State

534 So. 2d 1143 - Stowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 509 So. 2d 1104 - Griffis v. State · 512 So. 2d 181 - VanTassell v. State · 504 So. 2d 67 - Stowers v. State · 498 So. 2d 649 - VanTassell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DOES A TRIAL COURT’S STATEMENT, MADE AT THE TIME OF DEPARTURE FROM THE SENTENCING'1 GUIDELINES, THAT IT WOULD DEPART FOR ANY ONE OF THE REASONS GIVEN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER BOTH VALID AND INVALID REASONS ARE FOUND ON REVIEW, SATISFY THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN ALBRITTON V. STATE?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.