Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 So. 2d 329 - Hooks v. State

534 So. 2d 329 - Hooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
5
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 119 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 577 So. 2d 474 - Kuenzel v. State (1990), Dill v. State (1991)

1 federal appellate · 119 state decisions

7101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · Berkemer v. McCarty · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Furthermore, the court noted that the plain error doctrine requires that the `claimed error not only seriously affects”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Knight v. State · Dill v. State
  2. “The only relevant inquiry is how a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood his position.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fields v. State · Okafor v. State
  3. “The trial judge's and the prosecutor's remarks clearly defined the jury's role in the sentencing scheme. Thus, the jury could not have been confused as to its responsibility in the sentencing process. The remarks made here were a correct statement of the law and did not tend to mislead or misinform the jury. Therefore, we conclude the remarks were not improper under Caldwell , supra.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 777 So. 2d 162 - Hagood v. State · 768 So. 2d 981 - Mason v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.