Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 SO2D 771 - Abreu v. Amaro

Abreu v. Amaro’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2018

19 state decisions

901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hialeah, Inc. v. Bell · 418 So. 2d 437 - Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc. · Smith v. Smith · Frank v. Eeles · 53 So. 2d 312 - Pyle v. Pyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Findings of fact by a judge in a nonjury case will be affirmed where there is competent and substantial evidence to support those findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a constructive trust is a remedial device with dual objectives: to restore property to the rightful owner and to prevent unjust enrichment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Under Florida Law, once a plaintiff proves that he paid the purchase price for a piece of property, a presumption arises that it was the parties' intention that the individual holding legal title was to hold the property in trust for the payor. On such facts, a resulting trust is presumed as a matter of law. The burden then shifts to the transferee to show that the money was a gift or loan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.