¶1We affirm. State v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987). Although a majority of the reasons for departure were erroneous, *903we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed on the basis of Pentaudeand the egregious nature of the underlying reasons for appellant’s violation of probation. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).
534 So. 2d 902
534 So.2d 902
13 Fla.L.Weekly 2653
Snelling v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 8, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-12-08
Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 500 So. 2d 526 - State v. Pentaude
Decided 1988-12-08