534 So. 2d 933 - Lybeck v. Lybeck’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 375 So. 2d 875 - Ray v. Pentlicki · 436 So. 2d 1122 - Helmick v. Helmick · McEvily v. McEvily · 498 So. 2d 1348 - Dusesoi v. Dusesoi · 429 So. 2d 92 - FLA. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. Ciferni
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that the [intervening] Florida court had chosen to enforce the payment of a lesser amount of support [i.e., less than that previously fixed by a North Carolina judgment] will have no effect upon the North Carolina judgment. The arrearages [under the North Carolina judgment] will continue to accumulate subject to appropriate credit for any payments made under the Florida order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.