Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 SW2D 331 - Herrington v. State

Herrington v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2018

15 state decisions

8019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scamardo v. State · De Leon v. State · Cox v. State · 172 Tex. Crim. 45 - Taylor v. State · Kuenstler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where probationary conditions relate to the payment of restitution and court costs there must be a showing at the revocation hearing of the probationer’s ability to make the payments required and that the failure to make the restitution was intentional (citation), and the failure to pay court costs was willful. (Citations). We know of no reason why these requirements should not likewise apply to the payment of the supervisory or service fee authorized by Section 6a of Article 42.12, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., as amended 1967.” Id., at 333.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ . . . sufficiently required appellant to report not less than once per month, [citations omitted] However, it did not delegate authority to the probation officer to require weekly reports, and any such instructions given by the officer were beyond his legal authority and of no force. Parsons v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 513 S.W.2d 554 ; DeLeon v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 573 ; Campbell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 715 .” (emphasis added.) 534 S.W.2d 331, 334 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.