Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 534 SW2D 770 - Fann v. McGuffey

Fann v. McGuffey’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2006 · most notably Landgraf v. USI Film Products (1994), Bailey v. Reeves (1984)

4 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

2701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Barker v. Wingo · Schmerber v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Tort liability with respect to accidents occurring in this Commonwealth and arising from the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle is “abolished” for damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease to the extent the basic reparation benefits provided in this subtitle are payable therefor....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““6. Statute of limitations. An action for tort recovery not foreclosed by KRS 304.39-060 must be commenced within two years after the injury or death or after the last payment of no-fault benefits, whichever is later.” 534 S.W.2d at 775 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is elementary that the legislative branch of government has the prerogative of declaring public policy and that the mere wisdom of its choice in that respect is not subject to the judgment of a court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.