Ex parte Garcia’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Padilla v. Kentucky · Herrera v. Collins · Guzman v. State · Jae Lee v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] criminal defense attorney fails to provide effective assistance with the meaning of Strickland ..., if the attorney misleads a noncitizen client regarding the removal consequences of a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Garcia“the charge would probably not result in deportation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Garcia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.