State v. Prince’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Reese · State v. Forrest · State v. Sladek · United States v. Lemay · 197 L. Ed. 2d 500 - McLane Co. v. EEOC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence is logically relevant if it tends to make the existence of a material fact more or less probable.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams · State v. Lutes“Legal relevance weighs the probative value of the evidence against its costs—unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, waste of time, or cumulativeness.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lutes · In re Braddy“admissible for the purpose of corroborating the victim's testimony or demonstrating the defendant's propensity to commit the crime”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams · State v. Salmon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.