Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 A2D 1346 - Richardson v. Wile

Richardson v. Wile’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Daniels v. State (1988), Spielberg v. State (1989)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. · Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. · Almeida-Sanchez v. United States · Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Krongold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Delaware, it is a settled rule of construction to read a statute as a whole in an effort to effectuate its general legislative intent. Specifically, this Court has held: The object of statutory construction is to give a sensible and practical meaning to a statute as a whole in order that it may be applied to future cases without difficulty ... and if a literal interpretation leaves a result inconsistent with the general statutory intention, such [interpretation] must give way to the general intent. This is particularly true where such a literal interpretation would lead to unjust and mischievous consequences.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(9) To hear and determine questions of law certified to it by other Delaware courts and the United States District Court for the District of Delaware where it appears to the Supreme Court that there are important and urgent reasons for an immediate determination of such questions by it....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.