Brown v. Royalty’s Empirical Analysis
535 F.2d 1024 · 1976
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2016
16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game · Skogen v. The Dow Chemical Company · Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Ass'n Non-Stock of Big Springs v. Strand · Bankers Life & Casualty Company v. C. M. Kirtley, Trustee in Corporate Reorganization Proceedings of Automatic Washer Company · Chitta R. Nanda, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-Appellee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intent and degree of harm [resulting from an in limine violation] can best be judged by the judicial officer who observed the conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.