United States v. Lasater’s Empirical Analysis
535 F.2d 1041 · 1976
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Phillips (1976), United States v. Moeckly (1985)
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Branzburg v. Hayes · Ball v. United States · Serfass v. United States · Bronston v. United States · Kepner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Guilt could be found only by the jury, which was to hear the issues of falsity and knowledge. And, as the Court noted in Serfass, without a risk of determination of guilt there can be no attachment of jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This was to be a jury-tried case, and jeopardy could not attach until the jury was empaneled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was without power to enter a judgment of conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.