Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.2d 148 - Eisler v. Stritzler

Eisler v. Stritzler’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.2d 148 · 1976

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
8
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 21 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc. (1980), Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of Realtors (1988)

47 federal appellate · 21 district · 12 state decisions

490197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1653

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Bell v. Hood · Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we conclude that the district court had federal question jurisdiction over at least portions of this lawsuit, it would be a baseless formality to require plaintiffs to amend their complaint, and we consider plaintiffs' complaint to be amended as alleging jurisdiction under . . . [the federal-question-jurisdiction statute,] 28 U.S.C. [§] 1331”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rhode Island Truck Ctr v. Daimler Trucks North America · Southpark Square Limited, a Mississippi Corporation v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, State Highway Department of the State of Mississippi
  2. “Although we normally would be disinclined to note, sua sponte on appeal, alternative grounds for the district court's jurisdiction ..., there is no impediment to our doing so....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Johnnie P. Battle v. District of Columbia · City of Detroit Pension Fund v. Prudential Securities Inc.
  3. “[t]he default judgment on the well-pleaded allegations in plaintiff's complaint established ... defendant's liability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 778 F. Supp. 2d 157 - Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Away Discount · Goldman, Antonetti, Ferraiuoli, Axtmayer & Hertell v. Medfit International, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.