Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.2d 191 - United States v. Macklin

United States v. Macklin’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.2d 191 · 1976

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1990

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

90197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1010 · 18 U.S.C. § 3288 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on United States v. Durkee Famous Foods, Inc. · United States v. Macklin · United States v. Fein · Hemans v. United States · Hattaway v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever an indictment is dismissed for any error, defect, or irregularity with respect to the grand jury, or an indictment or information filed after the defendant waives in open court prosecution by indictment is found otherwise defective or insufficient for any cause, after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, or, if no regular grand jury is in session in the appropriate jurisdiction when the indictment or information is dismissed, within six calendar months of the date when the next regular grand jury is convened, which new indictment shall not be barred by any statute of limitations.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.