McLaughlin v. Wohlgemuth’s Empirical Analysis
535 F.2d 251 · 1976
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2017
6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp. · National Welfare Rights Organization v. Mathews · 398 F. Supp. 1 - Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Trade Commission · Bowen v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n determining need and the amount of the assistance payment, ... [n]et income available for current use and currently available resources shall be considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jamroz v. Blum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.