Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.2d 484 - United States v. Young

United States v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.2d 484 · 1976

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. United States · Brown v. United States · Examining Board of Engineers v. de Otero · United States v. Heiden · United States v. Boston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the outset we find that [appellants] Young and Enright each have standing to challenge the search as to Counts I and III. An element of each of those crimes charged is that appellants actually or constructively possessed the marijuana. Young does not have standing with respect to the importation count since possession was not an element of that offense. [Id.].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.