Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.2d 605 - Prebble v. Gordon Brodrick

Prebble v. Gordon Brodrick’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.2d 605 · 1976

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
4
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

66 federal appellate · 12 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably Meade v. Grubbs (1988), Melton v. City of Oklahoma City (1989)

66 federal appellate · 12 district · 4 state decisions

57019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Edelman v. Jordan · Perry v. Sindermann · Fuentes v. Shevin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demonstrated that the verdict was clearly or overwhelmingly against the weight of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Brown v. McGraw-Edison Co. · World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.
  2. “No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objections. Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Moe v. Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation
  3. “No expenditure may be made in excess of an appropriation and no money appropriated may be used for any purpose other than for which it is appropriated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. University of Rhode Island v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.