Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.3d 1038 - Lockerby v. Sierra

Lockerby v. Sierra’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.3d 1038 · 2008

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (2011), Oney v. Weinberg (In Re Wienberg) (2009)

1 federal appellate ·

240200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 523

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Kawaauhau v. Geiger · Kokoszka v. Belford · Globe Refining Company v. Landa Cotton Oil Company · Su v. C Su

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Expanding the scope of § 523(a)(6) to include contracts that are intentionally breached whenever it is substantially certain that injury will occur would severely circumscribe the ability of debtors to ‘start afresh.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(а) A discharge under section 727 ... of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— (б) for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The word “willful” in (a)(6) modifies the word “injury,” indicating that nondis-chargeability takes a deliberate or intentional injury, not merely a deliberate or intentional act that leads to injury, ... [T]he (a)(6) formulation triggers in the lawyer’s mind the category intentional torts, as distinguished from negligent or reckless torts. Intentional torts generally require that the actor intend the consequences of an act, not simply the act itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.