Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.3d 1053 - Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLC

Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.3d 1053 · 2008

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc. (2009), Farina v. Nokia Inc. (2010)

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

280200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Washington Western District Court)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2112 · 28 U.S.C. § 2341 · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 47 U.S.C. § 332 · 47 U.S.C. § 402

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission · Williamson v. General Dynamics Corp. · GTE South, Inc. v. Morrison · Wilson v. A. H. Belo Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce the Multidistrict Litigation Panel assigned petitions challenging the [ 2015 Declaratory Ruling ] to the D.C. Circuit, that court became 'the sole forum for addressing ... the validity of the FCC's rule[ ].'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin, set aside, suspend (in whole or in part), or to determine the validity of-all final orders of the Federal Communications Commission made reviewable by section 402(a) of title 47[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In the absence of an agency interpretation of the statute, we examine section 332(c)(3)(A) as we would any other statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.