Scrivner v. Mashburn’s Empirical Analysis
535 F.3d 1258 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Arizona v. California · Trw Inc v. Adelaide Andrews · United States v. Sutton · Mason v. Texaco, Inc. · Mountain America Credit Union v. Skinner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title .providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“calculated to compensate the estate for the actual monetary costs imposed by the debtor's misconduct, and was warranted to protect the integrity of the bankruptcy process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Section 105(a) does not empower courts to create remedies and rights in derogation of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.