Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 F.3d 225 - Iko v. Shreve

Iko v. Shreve’s Empirical Analysis

535 F.3d 225 · 2008

Citation profile

159
cited by 159 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 47 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 159 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Jackson v. Lightsey (2014), Thomas v. Bryant (2010)

24 federal appellate · 47 district · 1 state decisions

1340200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Estelle v. Gamble · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Farmer v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) 'the need for the application of force'; (2) 'the relationship between the need and the amount of force that was used'; (3) the extent of any reasonably perceived threat that the application of force was intended to quell; and (4) 'any efforts made to temper the severity of a forceful response.' " Iko , 535 F.3d at 239 (quoting Whitley , 475 U.S. at 321 , 106 S.Ct. 1078 ). The point of this analysis is to determine whether "[p]unitive intent behind a defendant's use of force may be inferred”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “acted with a sufficiently culpable state of mind,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “for the sole purpose of infliction of pain”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.