Burbank v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
535 F.3d 350 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Giglio v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Brecht v. Abrahamson · O'NEAL v. McAninch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“governs federal habeas review of constitutional errors that occur during a state trial”); Golphin v. Branker, 519 F.3d 168, 189, 190 (4fh Cir. 2008) (noting that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.