United States v. State’s Empirical Analysis
535 F.3d 844 · 2008
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2023
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973G (§ 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)
Relies on Rizzo v. Goode · Gregory v. Ashcroft · Avery v. Midland County · U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton · Cooper Tire Rubber Company v. St Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for clear abuse of discretion, reversing only when an improper evidentiary ruling affected [a party’s] substantial rights or had more than a slight influence on the verdict.” United States v. Two Shields, 497 F.3d 789 , 792 (8th Cir.2007) (citation omitted). We will not reverse if the error was harmless. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 61.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]ach State shall designate a State officer or employee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harkless v. Brunner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.