Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 FSUPP 1020 - Bertrand v. Sava

Bertrand v. Sava’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2010

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Barrett v. United States · McNally v. Hill · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty. · Lustig v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the absence of any apparent or declared reason — such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc. — the leave sought should, as the rules require, be “freely given.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “all Haitian aliens transferred from INS's Krome facility to the SPC on July 18, 1981, who have requested political asylum and parole, but have remained in respondent's custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reluctance to interfere inordinately with executive control of immigration policies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.