Tyler v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2013
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 2101 (Customs and Trade Act of 1990) · 19 U.S.C. § 2273 · 19 U.S.C. § 2320 · 19 U.S.C. § 2395
Relies on United States v. Nixon · Vitarelli v. Seaton · Microwave Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is most apparent to this court that: the Secretary of Labor already has made his final determination; he has communicated it to the plaintiff; and the parties are now before the court. To order the Secretary to publish the required notice of his final determination would only exalt form over substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.