Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 NE2D 530 - Games v. State

Games v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2015 · most notably Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona (1989), Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona (1989)

32 state decisions

2801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rideout v. United States · Pulley v. Harris · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Sloan v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We have recognized that the purpose of voir dire is to determine whether a. prospective juror can render a fair and impartial verdict in accordance with the law and the evidence. Murphy v. State (1984), Ind., 469 N.E.2d 750 . The trial court has broad discretionary powers to regulate the form and substance of voir dire, and it will be reversed only upon a showing of manifest abuse of such dis-eretion and a denial to the defendant of a fair trial. Marbley v. State (1984), Ind., 461 N.E.2d 1102 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “capacity to appreciate the criminality of [his] conduct or to conform that conduct to the requirements of law was substantially impaired as a result of mental disease or defect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.