Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 P2D 315 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Masciale v. United States · Hester v. United States · 25 Okla. Crim. 169 - Shouquette v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion, defendant is incorrect in arguing that the State had to prove an overt act after the payment of the drugs at Raley’s apartment; rather, from any or all of the six pieces of evidence listed above, the jury could logically have found the conspiracy, i. e. the agreement plus an overt act in furtherance thereof, existed before the drug payment. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.