Kvasnikoff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 53 Cal. 2d 187 - Jacobs v. Superior Court · McKinnon v. State · Roberts v. State · Kvasnikoff v. State · In Re GK
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The goals of sentencing are best met when a judge who is familiar with a case is permitted to determine whether probation should be revoked and the [previously suspended] sentence should be imposed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McRae v. State · Trenton v. State“Facially, AS 22.20.022 and Crim.R. 25(d) (2) appear to set forth different time requirements. However, since petitioner’s peremptory challenge is untimely under both provisions, we need not resolve the apparent conflict at this time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gieffels v. State“(1) Entitlement. In any criminal case in superior or district court, the prosecution and the defense shall each be entitled as a matter of right to one change of judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Webber v. Webber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.