Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 P2D 693 - Yeargain v. State

Yeargain v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Brown v. United States · Lamascus v. State · Allcorn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In deciding this case, therefore, it is sufficient to hold that there is no standing to contest a search and seizure where, as here, the defendants: (a) were not on the premises at the time of the contested search and seizure; (b) alleged no proprietary or possessory interest in the premises; and (c) were not charged with an offense that includes, as an essential element of the offense charged, possession of the seized evidence at the time of the contested search and seizure. . ⅜ * ⅜ # * ‡ “ . . . ‘Fourth Amendment rights are personal rights which, like some other constitutional rights may not be vicariously asserted. Simmons v. United, States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 [ 78 A.L.R.2d 233 ] (1960).’ Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 174 , 89 S.Ct. 961, 966 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The record reveals that the new attorneys, although they did not have benefit of the preliminary hearing transcript, did listen to the tape recording of the preliminary hearing prior to trial, and had these tapes available to them throughout the entire trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.