Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 SO2D 218 - Ex Parte Brownlee

Ex Parte Brownlee’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2008

11 state decisions

80198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nardone v. United States · O'Connell v. Manning · Duncan v. State · Wrightson v. United States · Rogers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a police officer arrests without a warrant, and the defendant objects to the introduction of evidence seized as an incident to the arrest, 'the burden is on the State to show that the arrest was lawful' pursuant to § 15-10-3 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"(a) An officer may arrest any person without a warrant, on any day and at any time for: ". . . . "(6) When he has actual knowledge that a warrant for the person's arrest for the commission of a felony or misdemeanor has been issued, provided such warrant was issued in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. However, upon request he shall show the warrant to the arrested person as soon as possible. If the officer does not have the warrant in his possession at the time of the arrest he shall then inform the defendant of the offense charged and the fact that a warrant has been issued."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.