Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

535 So. 2d 359

535 So.2d 359

14 Fla.L.Weekly 157

Gates v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-01-04

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1996

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-01-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The record shows that during the oral pronouncement of sentence, the trial judge made inconsistent statements concerning whether he intended to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences on appellant. The sentences rendered maintained this inconsistency. Therefore, we affirm appellant’s convictions and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to clarify the sentences imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate.

¶2*360AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

LETTS, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
/535/so2d/359 · .json · Public domain