Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 SO2D 486 - Wall v. Brown & Root, Inc.

Wall v. Brown & Root, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daniels v. Conn · Michaleski v. Western Preferred Cas. Co. · Reed v. House of Decor, Inc. · 148 So. 2d 822 - Wills v. Correge · Quinette v. Delhommer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a party is liable for the act of a [tort-feasor] on the basis that the [tort-feasor] was the party's employee in the course and scope of employment depends upon the proof and assessment of several factors, including payment of wages by the employer, the employer's power of control, the employee's duty to perform the particular act, the time, place and purpose of the act in relation to service of the employer, the relationship between the employee's act and the employer's business, the benefits received by t[he] employer from the act, the motivation of the employee for performing the act, and the reasonable expectation of the employer that the employee would perform the act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.