Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 SO2D 943 - State v. Lewis

State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 870 So. 2d 995 - State v. Johnson (2004), 591 So. 2d 391 - State v. Turner (1991)

29 state decisions

1401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The function of the judicial officer in determining the existence of probable cause is to make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information, that there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he location and type of weapons found in defendant's residence coupled with the statement by defendant that the 9-mm. pistol belonged to his wife, plus the presence of the shoulder holster in the master bedroom, strongly indicate defendant's awareness, dominion, and control over the firearms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the two are concomitant offenses or form one continuous series of events, and thus are a part of the res gestae, which is admissible without balancing its probative value against its prejudicial effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.