Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 SW2D 337 - Barger v. Brock

Barger v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC (2013), Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al. (2015)

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

160197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · Memphis Street Railway Co. v. Byrne · Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. · Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. Stuart · Hurt v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a controlling principle that inferior courts must abide the orders, decrees and precedents of higher courts. The slightest deviation from this rigid rule would disrupt and destroy the sanctity of the judicial process. There would be no finality or stability in the law and the court system would be chaotic in its operation and unstable and inconsistent in its decisions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “and its jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by the other branches of the government. Its adjudications are final and conclusive upon all questions determined by it , save those reserved to the federal courts, which may be reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he inferior courts of the state may not entertain any suit or action challenging the validity of any Rule of this Court. Such a suit would be in the nature of a bill of review or to impeach a judgment of this Court....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.