Sanders v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “• Had she requested verdict-director specificity, she believed the prosecutor would have gotten all four incidents into the instruction. • She "would have not been happy about that at all." To have "multiple incidents listed [in the instruction] and ... the jury then ask[ed] to reach a unanimous verdict," "would have been horrible, [and] would have been as if I was sending back trial testimony with the jury instruction."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Sanders v. State

2. “[t]he motion court did not address or make any findings whether [Counsel's] decision not to object was reasonable trial strategy per Strickland [ v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986) ].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Sanders v. State

3. “Id . at 409-10. It must be the motion court that issues findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented. Rule 29.15(k). Our review is limited, by rule,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Sanders v. State