Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 535 SW3D 733 - Propst v. State

Propst v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Price v. State · Mark D. Vogl v. State of Missouri · McFadden v. State · Nicholson v. State · Spells v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellate review of a motion court's dismissal of a postconviction relief motion is limited to determining whether the findings and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous. A motion court's findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous if this Court "is left with the definite and firm impression that a mistake has been made" after a review of the entire record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]ailure to file a motion within the time provided by this Rule 29.15 shall constitute a complete waiver of any right to proceed under this Rule 29.15 and a complete waiver of any claim that could be raised in a motion filed pursuant to this Rule 29.15.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.